Browse zstd specs (34 of 44)
Proofs / zstd / Earlier, longer properties
x_bound
ZSTD_COMPRESSBOUND(A) + ZSTD_COMPRESSBOUND(B) <= ZSTD_COMPRESSBOUND(A + B) for A, B of at least 128 KB with A + B < ZSTD_MAX_INPUT_SIZE.
- spec
- 16 lines of C
- status
- Proved
- 34 of 44
On this page
The spec
The spec is the C program harness/x_bound.c, 16 lines, shown whole as it is in the repository at 2e46017. Its first comment states the property in full, with every bound.
// Law bound (PROMISES.md: C6): the compression bound of zstd.h.
//
// Claim (QuickProof.Contract.harness_safe of this program): every gp_assert holds: for ANY sizes A, B >= 128 KB with
// A + B < ZSTD_MAX_INPUT_SIZE, "bound(A) + bound(B) <= bound(A+B)" (ZSTD_COMPRESSBOUND: "this formula ensures that
// bound(A) + bound(B) <= bound(A+B) as long as A and B >= 128 KB"). (ZSTD_compressBound, the function, is the
// compressor's, which this project does not verify.)
#include "quickproof.h"
#include "zstd.h"
int main(void)
{
size_t a = nondet_size(), b = nondet_size();
if (a >= (128 << 10) && b >= (128 << 10) && a < ZSTD_MAX_INPUT_SIZE && b < ZSTD_MAX_INPUT_SIZE - a)
gp_assert(ZSTD_COMPRESSBOUND(a) + ZSTD_COMPRESSBOUND(b) <= ZSTD_COMPRESSBOUND(a + b));
return 0;
}The theorem
QuickProof generated this statement from the spec, in src/contracts/x_bound.v:
Theorem x_bound : harness_safe whole_prog.src/contracts/laws.v states it on the spec's own program, whole_prog (the spec linked with the code under test), with its proof:
Theorem x_bound : harness_safe Zstd.contracts.x_bound.whole_prog.
Proof. exact (proj1 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 Zstd.contracts.suite.suite_x))))))))). Qed.Read as a statement about runs, it says that no run of the program has undefined behaviour or a failing check, for every value the spec can draw. That reading rests on VST's adequacy theorem, which is not yet instantiated in Rocq (formerly Coq) for QuickProof's environment.
The C files (units) its program links
patch/decoder.cquickproof/libc/libc.cquickproof/libc/malloc_unit.c
What it leaves out
- What the first comment of the spec excludes, and its bounds.
- Like every spec of this proof: termination (a run that never returns is not a counterexample), one thread, and binaries built by a compiler (the theorem is about the code as CompCert defines C for x86_64, LP64).
- Other configurations of zstd (flags, legacy formats, assembly) and the compressor.
- The edits to zstd's code, listed in the repository, are checked against the original by testing, not proved.
The summary page says what the proof as a whole covers.
How it was proved
AI agents wrote the proof, and Rocq checks it. qp verify passes on this repository: this statement is the one generated from the spec at the contract commit, and its proof uses only Rocq's standard axioms and VST's abstract malloc library.