Browse WireGuard specs (14 of 38)
Proofs / WireGuard / Encryption and the primitives
ae_roundtrip
ChaCha20-Poly1305: for any message, associated data, 64-bit nonce and key, decrypting what encryption wrote succeeds and gives back exactly the message.
- spec
- 29 lines of C
- with its headers
- 69 lines
- status
- Proved
- 14 of 38
On this page
The spec
The spec is the C program harness/ae_roundtrip.c, 29 lines, shown whole as it is in the repository at 3c1fc13. It includes harness/wg_laws.h (40 lines). Its first comment states the property in full, with every bound.
// Law ae_roundtrip: For any message (up to PTRDIFF_MAX - 16 bytes), any associated data (up to PTRDIFF_MAX bytes),
// any 64-bit nonce and any 32-byte key, chacha20poly1305_encrypt writes the message's length + 16 bytes, and
// chacha20poly1305_decrypt of exactly those bytes with the same associated data, nonce and key returns true and
// gives back exactly the message (each buffer an object of its own; a failed malloc ends the run).
#include "wg_laws.h"
int main(void) {
// Choose the inputs: any message, associated data, nonce and key
size_t len = upto(PTRDIFF_MAX - CHACHA20POLY1305_AUTHTAG_SIZE);
size_t ad_len = upto(PTRDIFF_MAX);
u8 *message = any_bytes(len);
u8 *ad = any_bytes(ad_len);
u8 *sealed = malloc(len + CHACHA20POLY1305_AUTHTAG_SIZE);
u8 *opened = any_bytes(len);
if (message == NULL || ad == NULL || sealed == NULL || opened == NULL)
return 0;
u8 key[CHACHA20POLY1305_KEY_SIZE];
nondet_bytes(key, sizeof key);
u64 nonce = any_u64();
// Encrypt, then decrypt. lib/crypto/chacha20poly1305.c: "This is an implementation of the ChaCha20Poly1305
// AEAD construction. Information: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8439"; RFC 8439, 2.8: "The calculated tag is
// bitwise compared to the received tag. The message is authenticated if and only if the tags match."
chacha20poly1305_encrypt(sealed, message, len, ad, ad_len, nonce, key);
bool ok = chacha20poly1305_decrypt(opened, sealed, len + CHACHA20POLY1305_AUTHTAG_SIZE, ad, ad_len, nonce, key);
// Check
gp_assert(ok != 0);
gp_assert(bytes_eq(opened, message, len));
return 0;
}harness/wg_laws.h, 40 lines
// wg_laws.h: trivial helpers shared by the WireGuard laws (each law includes it once). No models, no algorithms.
#include "quickproof.h"
#include "noise.h"
#include <crypto/blake2s.h>
#include <crypto/chacha.h>
#include <crypto/poly1305.h>
#include <crypto/chacha20poly1305.h>
bool wg_counter_validate(struct noise_replay_counter *counter, u64 nonce); // receive.c's counter_validate (S19)
#define REJECT_AFTER (U64_MAX - COUNTER_WINDOW_SIZE - 1) // messages.h: REJECT_AFTER_MESSAGES, 2^64 - 8130
static size_t upto(size_t max) { // any value from 0 to max
size_t value = nondet_size();
return value < max ? value : max;
}
static u64 any_u64(void) { // any 64-bit value
u64 high = nondet_u32();
return high << 32 | nondet_u32();
}
static u8 *any_bytes(size_t n) { // a new object of n arbitrary bytes (NULL if malloc fails)
u8 *bytes = malloc(n);
if (bytes != NULL && n != 0)
nondet_bytes(bytes, n);
return bytes;
}
static u8 *copy_of(const u8 *source, size_t n) { // a new object holding source[0..n-1]
u8 *copy = malloc(n);
for (size_t i = 0; copy != NULL && i < n; i++)
copy[i] = source[i];
return copy;
}
static int bytes_eq(const u8 *a, const u8 *b, size_t n) { // a[0..n-1] == b[0..n-1]
for (size_t i = 0; i < n; i++)
if (a[i] != b[i])
return 0;
return 1;
}
static void new_counter(struct noise_replay_counter *c) { // a new key's replay counter: zero (keypair_create)
c->counter = 0;
for (size_t i = 0; i < COUNTER_BITS_TOTAL / BITS_PER_LONG; i++)
c->backtrack[i] = 0;
}The theorem
QuickProof generated this statement from the spec, in src/contracts/ae_roundtrip.v:
Theorem ae_roundtrip : harness_safe whole_prog.src/contracts/laws.v states it on the spec's own program, whole_prog (the spec linked with the code under test), with its proof:
Theorem ae_roundtrip : harness_safe WgNoise.contracts.ae_roundtrip.whole_prog.
Proof. exact (proj1 (proj2 WgNoise.contracts.suite.suite)). Qed.Read as a statement about runs, it says that no run of the program has undefined behaviour or a failing check, for every value the spec can draw. That reading rests on VST's adequacy theorem, which is not yet instantiated in Rocq (formerly Coq) for QuickProof's environment.
The C files (units) its program links
lib/crypto/chacha.clib/crypto/chacha-block-generic.clib/crypto/poly1305.clib/crypto/poly1305-donna32.clib/crypto/chacha20poly1305.cpatch/wg_shim.cquickproof/libc/libc.c
What it leaves out
- What the first comment of the spec excludes, and its bounds.
- Like every spec of this proof: runs of more than one thread (the locks and RCU are those of one thread), termination (a run that never returns is not a counterexample), and binaries built by a compiler (the theorem is about the code as CompCert defines C for 64-bit x86).
- The kernel around the code is a shim of plain C for one thread, and the code carries rewrites of idioms that VST cannot handle. Both are tested against the kernel's code, not proved.
The summary page says what the proof as a whole covers.
How it was proved
AI agents wrote the proof, and Rocq checks it. qp verify passes on this repository: this statement is the one generated from the spec at the contract commit, and its proof uses only Rocq's standard axioms and VST's abstract malloc library.