Browse WireGuard specs (10 of 38)

Proofs / WireGuard / Replay protection

rp_duplicate

A nonce that was accepted is rejected when it comes again, after any nonces in between.

spec
25 lines of C
with its headers
65 lines
status
Proved
10 of 38
On this page

The spec

The spec is the C program harness/rp_duplicate.c, 25 lines, shown whole as it is in the repository at 3c1fc13. It includes harness/wg_laws.h (40 lines). Its first comment states the property in full, with every bound.

C
// Law rp_duplicate: For a new key's replay window (zero, as keypair_create makes it), after any sequence of any number
// of any nonces given to counter_validate, a nonce that it accepts is rejected when it is given again, after any
// further sequence of any number of any nonces.
#include "wg_laws.h"

int main(void) {
	// Choose the inputs: any nonces, then the nonce n
	struct noise_replay_counter window;
	new_counter(&window);
	while (nondet_u8() != 0)
		(void) wg_counter_validate(&window, any_u64());
	u64 n = any_u64();
	bool first = wg_counter_validate(&window, n);
	if (first == 0)
		return 0;
	// Any nonces after it, n among them or not
	while (nondet_u8() != 0)
		(void) wg_counter_validate(&window, any_u64());
	// Check. RFC 6479, section 2: the bit of each sequence number "indicates whether or not a packet with that
	// sequence number has been received and authenticated, so that the replay packet can be detected and
	// rejected"; receive.c: "This is RFC6479"; selftest/counter.c, tests 3, 7, 10, 13, 16, 23, 28, 32.
	bool again = wg_counter_validate(&window, n);
	gp_assert(again == 0);
	return 0;
}
harness/wg_laws.h, 40 lines
C
// wg_laws.h: trivial helpers shared by the WireGuard laws (each law includes it once). No models, no algorithms.
#include "quickproof.h"
#include "noise.h"
#include <crypto/blake2s.h>
#include <crypto/chacha.h>
#include <crypto/poly1305.h>
#include <crypto/chacha20poly1305.h>
bool wg_counter_validate(struct noise_replay_counter *counter, u64 nonce);   // receive.c's counter_validate (S19)
#define REJECT_AFTER (U64_MAX - COUNTER_WINDOW_SIZE - 1)   // messages.h: REJECT_AFTER_MESSAGES, 2^64 - 8130
static size_t upto(size_t max) {                      // any value from 0 to max
	size_t value = nondet_size();
	return value < max ? value : max;
}
static u64 any_u64(void) {                            // any 64-bit value
	u64 high = nondet_u32();
	return high << 32 | nondet_u32();
}
static u8 *any_bytes(size_t n) {                      // a new object of n arbitrary bytes (NULL if malloc fails)
	u8 *bytes = malloc(n);
	if (bytes != NULL && n != 0)
		nondet_bytes(bytes, n);
	return bytes;
}
static u8 *copy_of(const u8 *source, size_t n) {      // a new object holding source[0..n-1]
	u8 *copy = malloc(n);
	for (size_t i = 0; copy != NULL && i < n; i++)
		copy[i] = source[i];
	return copy;
}
static int bytes_eq(const u8 *a, const u8 *b, size_t n) {   // a[0..n-1] == b[0..n-1]
	for (size_t i = 0; i < n; i++)
		if (a[i] != b[i])
			return 0;
	return 1;
}
static void new_counter(struct noise_replay_counter *c) {    // a new key's replay counter: zero (keypair_create)
	c->counter = 0;
	for (size_t i = 0; i < COUNTER_BITS_TOTAL / BITS_PER_LONG; i++)
		c->backtrack[i] = 0;
}

The theorem

QuickProof generated this statement from the spec, in src/contracts/rp_duplicate.v:

Rocq
Theorem rp_duplicate : harness_safe whole_prog.

src/contracts/laws.v states it on the spec's own program, whole_prog (the spec linked with the code under test), with its proof:

Rocq
Theorem rp_duplicate : harness_safe WgNoise.contracts.rp_duplicate.whole_prog.
Proof. exact (proj1 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 (proj2 WgNoise.contracts.suite.suite)))))))))))))))). Qed.

Read as a statement about runs, it says that no run of the program has undefined behaviour or a failing check, for every value the spec can draw. That reading rests on VST's adequacy theorem, which is not yet instantiated in Rocq (formerly Coq) for QuickProof's environment.

The C files (units) its program links
  • patch/counter_validate.c

What it leaves out

  • What the first comment of the spec excludes, and its bounds.
  • Like every spec of this proof: runs of more than one thread (the locks and RCU are those of one thread), termination (a run that never returns is not a counterexample), and binaries built by a compiler (the theorem is about the code as CompCert defines C for 64-bit x86).
  • The kernel around the code is a shim of plain C for one thread, and the code carries rewrites of idioms that VST cannot handle. Both are tested against the kernel's code, not proved.

The summary page says what the proof as a whole covers.

How it was proved

AI agents wrote the proof, and Rocq checks it. qp verify passes on this repository: this statement is the one generated from the spec at the contract commit, and its proof uses only Rocq's standard axioms and VST's abstract malloc library.